Part 4: Peer-reviewed published research on climate economics might be badly wrong
An excellent piece. However, I am not in the least surprised at the failures of the academic review process. That has been a problem in climate studies for decades, as in other areas, notably nutrition.
Yes, I think it’s a general problem. Academic publishing is a sub-optimal way to allocate university positions, salaries, grants, etc.
An excellent piece. However, I am not in the least surprised at the failures of the academic review process. That has been a problem in climate studies for decades, as in other areas, notably nutrition.
Yes, I think it’s a general problem. Academic publishing is a sub-optimal way to allocate university positions, salaries, grants, etc.